Our Rating and Valuation Methodology

Rating video image

How use Eyestock Rating?

Rating video image

How use valuation?

Securities with high Eyestock Rating consistently outperform the market

Annual portfolio return

eyestock

21.1%

S&P 500

13.7%

Portfolio return over 5 years

eyestock

+161%

S&P 500

+90%

What stocks are included in the eyestock portfolio?

Eyestock Rating

High

Valuation

Undervalued

Market cap

Large

Benchmark outperformance

71%

Information ratio

0.81

Eyestock portfolio consists of an average of 20 US undervalued by Eyestock methodology stocks with high Eyestock Rating. Returns are based on historical performance (backtest method) from January 2019 to December 2023. The portfolio was rebalanced quarterly, and returns were calculated with an equal distribution of weights and taking into account the actual dates on which companies published new reports.

How is the Eyestock Rating calculated

Our methodology is based on the comprehensive analysis of 10 indicators of a company's financial metrics in each of the following areas: Profitability, Balance, Operating Efficiency and Stability

Profitability

Measures how efficiently a company can convert its operations and investments into profit.

Gross Margin

Net Profit Margin

Earnings quality

Balance

Companies with low debt burden have higher growth potential and lower risk

Debt / Equity ratio

CFO / Debt ratio

Current ratio

Efficiency

The effectiveness with which a company manages its resources to produce goods and services.

ROE

ROIC

Stability

The ability to facilitate and enhance economic processes, manage risks, and absorb shocks.

Stability Ratio (2y)

Stability Ratio (5y)

* Weight of each indicator

Eyestock Rating Calculation Example: Microsoft (MSFT)

Each of the 10 indicators is evaluated against its respective benchmark, receiving a score based on its outperformance/underperformance of the benchmark. The company's overall rating is then determined by aggregating these weight adjusted scores.

MSFT

Microsoft Corp

MSFT

Microsoft Corp

Profitability

37%

Balance

28%

Efficiency

35%

Stability

29%

Eyestock Rating

128%
Profitability
Balance
Efficiency
Stability

Net Profit Margin

Net profit margin is the proportion of revenue a company retains after taking into account all costs incurred. The value of 20% is the benchmark for calculating a company rating in eyestock scoring model.

141%

Earnings quality

Earnings quality is the ability to confirm the profit accrued in the financial statements by actually received cash on the company accounts. The value of 100% is the benchmark for calculating a company rating in eyestock scoring model.

144%

Gross Margin

Gross margin is the proportion of revenue that a company retains after the costs incurred to produce marketable goods and services. The value of 40% is the benchmark for calculating a company rating in eyestock scoring model.

162%

Total profitability

37%
Profitability
Balance
Efficiency
Stability

Financial

Value

Benchmark

Check

Net Profit Margin

Net profit margin is the proportion of revenue a company retains after taking into account all costs incurred. The value of 20% is the benchmark for calculating a company rating in eyestock scoring model.

36 %

20%

Earnings quality

Earnings quality is the ability to confirm the profit accrued in the financial statements by actually received cash on the company accounts. The value of 100% is the benchmark for calculating a company rating in eyestock scoring model.

128 %

100%

Gross Margin

Gross margin is the proportion of revenue that a company retains after the costs incurred to produce marketable goods and services. The value of 40% is the benchmark for calculating a company rating in eyestock scoring model.

70 %

40%

Benchmarks

The Eyestock Rating is calculated based on the relative performance of each of the indicators vs its benchmark.

Benchmarks are calculated both based on our own statistical research as well as insights from other investors such as Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, and Peter Lynch.

Profitability

Gross Margin

40%

Net Profit Margin

20%

Earnings quality

100%

Balance

Debt / Equity ratio

0.5

CFO / Debt ratio

1

Current ratio

1.5

Efficiency

ROE

20%

ROIC

20%

Stability

Stability Ratio (2y)

1.5

Stability Ratio (5y)

1

How to use Eyestock Rating

1

Simplified Ratings derived from complex data analysis

The Eyestock Rating of MSFT is above 100% based on the company's financial indicators outperforming their benchmarks. This makes it a viable investment idea.

MSFT

Microsoft Corp

128%
-100%
200%
High

Eyestock Rating

Above 100%
50 - 100%
Below 50%

Status

High
Moderate
Low

Description

Viable Investment
Somewhat Risky Investment
Extremely Risky Investment

High - Above 100%

Viable Investment

Moderate - 50 - 100%

Somewhat Risky Investment

Low - Below 50%

Extremely Risky Investment

2

Track the Historical Eyestock Rating

In this case, MSFT Eyestock Rating has consistently been above 100%, unlike other mega-cap companies Coca-Cola and Disney.

Microsoft
Coca-Cola
Disney
1y
3y
5y
All time
100%
The Eyestock benchmark company to invest has a rating of 100%

3

Compare Eyestock Rating of peer companies vs an index

Eyestock Rating will not only save time on your market analysis, but will also increases your return on investments.

Microsoft

Coca-Cola

Disney

S&P 500

05.2024

Microsoft -

undefined%

Coca-Cola -

undefined%

Disney -

undefined%

S&P 500 -

undefined%

Valuation

Our valuation process emphasizes the use of historical Price-to-Earnings (P/E) values. The P/E ratio, a key metric comparing a company's market price per share to its earnings per share (EPS), is central to our analysis. By evaluating historical P/E ratios, we place a company's current financial metrics within a broader historical context. This comprehensive approach allows us to identify potential investment opportunities by highlighting discrepancies between a stock's market price and its intrinsic value, informed by its historical performance and valuation trends.

The interactive chart below shows the historical valuation of a stock (GRMN)

Greatly undervalued
Undervalued
Fair valued
Overvalued

Greatly Undervalued

If the current P/E is below its minimum historical value (green line), the stock is at the lowest capitalization to its net income ratio over the specified time period. Such an investment could have great potential.

The minimum value level on the charts is indicated by a green line. Pay attention to the periods at the beginning of 2020 and the end of 2022 when the price dropped or came very close to it. GRMN shares at these moments had the status of being greatly undervalued by Eyestock methodology, after which a powerful and confident price growth followed.

Price chart is not available
1y
3y
5y
All time
Market price
Avg value
The share price at which the company's value in relation to net income will be at the average level over the past 5 years
Min value
The share price at which the company's value in relation to net income will be the lowest in the last 5 years
Max value
The share price at which the company's value in relation to net income will be the highest in the last 5 years
16.05.2024

Open:

High:

Low:

Close:

Methodology Constraints

We are very careful about the quality of the data used in our methodology. We meticulously collect data from our official data vendor Finnhub LTD in order to calculate the company's rating as accurately and in detail as possible. But sometimes you may face that the company's rating is not available. This is due to contrains of the methodology or available data.

Eyestock Rating calculations exclude:

Banks

Insurance companies

REITs

Companies without any revenue

We do not calculate Eyestock Rating if:

Fewer than three years of public financial records available

The company's reporting frequency has changed

The data received from the supplier is incomplete

The company does not disclose the data necessary to calculate key indicators